2013-04-19, 17:13
I have a plan to try and prove what the real world loss of efficiency is with a NuVinci hub. First I will try to explain the factors that affect the efficiency.
NuVinci hubs are a tilting ball type transmission which works by using traction. This means there will be a rolling resistance similar to that of a train’s wheel on a rail. This resistance is proportional to the pressure between the rolling surfaces, the higher the pressure the more the resistance. It makes sense that the efficiency of power transfer from one traction ring to the other via the balls is dependent upon the clamping pressure. To avoid slippage the clamping pressure must increase as torque increases. Therefore the efficiency is inversely proportional to torque. If the torque transferred through the transmission is increased the efficiency will decrease.
There are three factors that can decrease the efficiency
1. Low cadence
2. Low road speed
3. Increased power
It is of course possible to increase the power without increasing torque by also increasing rpm but an increase in power tends to involve some increase in torque. There is also another factor that affects the efficiency of a tilting ball transmission and that is ratio. The further from the 1:1 ratio, the lower the efficiency.
So under what conditions will a NuVinci hub be least efficient? I recon when climbing the steepest hill as this is when all three things that decrease efficiency occur at once. To climb a really steep hill the lowest ratio will be needed but due to the min sprocket ratio it won’t be low enough so cadence will be low. A lot of power is required to keep moving and at a below ideal cadence will result in greatly increased input torque. Even at maximum power output road speed will be low resulting in increased torque on the output side as well.
What I’m considering doing is comparing with the help of a HRM the effort required to ride three different bikes up the steepest surfaced hill I know of.
The three bikes are
A NuVinci equipped steel framed 1990s maintain bike which is set up for commuting.
A derailleur equipped steel framed maintain bike set up for off road use and trailer towing.
A cheap derailleur equipped aluminium framed road bike.
The hill or the steepest section of it that I will use climbs 30m in a distance of about 100m giving an average gradient of 1 in 3 or 33%. Short sections of it must be nearer to 1 in 2 or 50% see attached photos.
I ‘m hoping to do the test in the next few months and the results will be posted here.
NuVinci hubs are a tilting ball type transmission which works by using traction. This means there will be a rolling resistance similar to that of a train’s wheel on a rail. This resistance is proportional to the pressure between the rolling surfaces, the higher the pressure the more the resistance. It makes sense that the efficiency of power transfer from one traction ring to the other via the balls is dependent upon the clamping pressure. To avoid slippage the clamping pressure must increase as torque increases. Therefore the efficiency is inversely proportional to torque. If the torque transferred through the transmission is increased the efficiency will decrease.
There are three factors that can decrease the efficiency
1. Low cadence
2. Low road speed
3. Increased power
It is of course possible to increase the power without increasing torque by also increasing rpm but an increase in power tends to involve some increase in torque. There is also another factor that affects the efficiency of a tilting ball transmission and that is ratio. The further from the 1:1 ratio, the lower the efficiency.
So under what conditions will a NuVinci hub be least efficient? I recon when climbing the steepest hill as this is when all three things that decrease efficiency occur at once. To climb a really steep hill the lowest ratio will be needed but due to the min sprocket ratio it won’t be low enough so cadence will be low. A lot of power is required to keep moving and at a below ideal cadence will result in greatly increased input torque. Even at maximum power output road speed will be low resulting in increased torque on the output side as well.
What I’m considering doing is comparing with the help of a HRM the effort required to ride three different bikes up the steepest surfaced hill I know of.
The three bikes are
A NuVinci equipped steel framed 1990s maintain bike which is set up for commuting.
A derailleur equipped steel framed maintain bike set up for off road use and trailer towing.
A cheap derailleur equipped aluminium framed road bike.
The hill or the steepest section of it that I will use climbs 30m in a distance of about 100m giving an average gradient of 1 in 3 or 33%. Short sections of it must be nearer to 1 in 2 or 50% see attached photos.
I ‘m hoping to do the test in the next few months and the results will be posted here.